MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997446165 · doi:10.3934/math.2019.6.1745

Multigrid method for pricing European options under the CGMY process

2019· article· en· W2997446165 on OpenAlexaff
Justin W. L. Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Mathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultigrid methodApplied mathematicsDiscretizationFast Fourier transformMathematical optimizationMathematicsSmoothingPartial differential equationKernel (algebra)Matrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a fast multigrid method for solving the discrete partial integro-differential equations (PIDEs) arising from pricing European options when the underlying asset is driven by an infinite activity Lévy process. We consider the CGMY model whose kernel singularity gets worse when the parameter <em>Y</em> approaches two. Due to the integral term, the discretization matrix is dense. In order to obtain an efficient multigrid method, we apply a fixed point iteration as a smoother for multigrid. In each smoothing step, we only need to solve a sparse matrix corresponding to the differential operator and compute a matrix-vector product involving the integral operator by a fast Fourier transform (FFT). We prove that the fixed point iteration smoother is effective reducing the high frequency components. Moreover, we also prove a two-grid convergence of the multigrid method by a local mode analysis. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the multigrid method by solving the option pricing equation under the CGMY model with finite and infinite variation processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS MathematicsSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207