MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997499168 · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1542

Effect of Target Lift Coefficient on Aerodynamic Optimization of Transonic Leading Edge Tubercles

2020· article· en· W2997499168 on OpenAlexaff
Ryley R. Colpitts, Ruben E. Perez, Peter Jansen, Alexi Levert-Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransonicAerodynamicsLift coefficientAerospace engineeringWingLeading edgeLift (data mining)AirfoilComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringPhysicsMechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leading edge tubercles have shown to delay stall on subsonic speeds and modify shockwave behaviour at transonic speeds. However, limited knowledge exist to date on the effects of leading edge tubercles in transonic flow. This work explores the aerodynamic shape optimization of the tubercles shape at a freestream flow velocity of Mach 0.82 subject to a target lift coefficient. Results of the optimization effort solving Euler equations shows that a power function shaped tubercle geometry with a specific amplitude and wavelength creates significant cross-flow from the pressure differential between peak and valleys. This reduces the strength of the shockwave and leads to an increase in aerodynamic efficiency up to 15.0%, a decrease in pitching moment up to 15.9%, while suffering minor losses in lift curve slope capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Scitech 2020 ForumSame topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207