Two plans of the Tatar Quarter of Kazan the middle of the 18th century from the Russian state archive of ancient acts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of cartographic sources of the 18th century specifies and supplements ideas of scientists of the spatial structure of quarters in general and separate details of planning in particular. In the Tatar settlement of Kazan of the middle of the 18th century, there were serious processes related to eviction of a part on the new territory and filling of the freed territories with new architectural and planning sites. As a result, the Tatar Quarter structure, which hardly changed in the 16th–17th centuries, underwent significant changes. Examination of these changes as concerning all settlement, and some of its interesting details is given in this article. The historical analysis of changes is comp¬lemented with modern geoinformation methods. Data on the specifics of the Old Tatar, New Tatar and New Epiphany quarters, old and new cemeteries of the Tatar settlement have been outlined, information on brick production in the territory of the Tatar Quarter during the specified period is given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".