MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997522932 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2019.2958049

FPGA-Accelerated 3rd Generation DNA Sequencing

2020· article· en· W2997522932 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhongpan Wu, Karim Hammad, Ebrahim Ghafar‐Zadeh, Sebastian Magierowski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Food Inspection AgencyCMC Microsystems
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayPortingComputer scienceKey (lock)Embedded systemMobile deviceReduction (mathematics)SoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA measurement machines are undergoing an orders-of-magnitude size and power reduction. As a result, the analysis of genetic molecules is increasingly appropriate for mobile platforms. However, sequencing these measurements (converting to the molecule's A-C-G-T text equivalent) requires intense computing resources, a problem for potential realizations as mobile devices. This paper proposes a step towards addressing this issue, the design and implementation of a low-power real-time FPGA hardware accelerator for the basecalling task of nanopore-based DNA measurements. Key basecalling computations are identified and ported to a custom FPGA which operates in tandem with a CPU across a high-speed serial link and a simple API. A measured speed-up over CPU-only basecalling in excess of 100X is realized with an energy efficiency improvement of three orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207