Surface pressure and coherent structure evolution on an axially accelerated delta wing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow field, forces, moments, and surface pressure of a NACA 0012 airfoil wing with triangular planform geometry undergoing steady and unsteady translations were measured as a model of a unmanned combat air vehicles encountering unsteady environments. To characterize the evolution of the flow field structures, a Lagrangian flow field analysis including the finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) was included. Results show that axial acceleration can induce flow reattachment at high angles of attack, and FTLE can indicate the reattachment and its location as it progresses along the wing chord. At such location, the relevant change in surface pressure distribution is also observed in the experimental data, as well as correlated fluctuations in lift, drag, and pitching moment. This augmented understanding of vorticity production, reorientation, and annihilation around and in the wake of complex three-dimensional bodies may provide critical insight for effective flow-control development on vehicles unsteady environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it