MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ÖĞRENCİLERİN SOMUT OLMAYAN KÜLTÜREL MİRASA İLİŞKİN FARKINDALIKLARININ BELİRLENMESİ

2019· article· tr· W2997587252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · 2019
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEducation Practices and Challenges
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPsychologyHumanitiesMathematicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu araştırma, Safranbolu’da bir devlet okulunda öğrenim gören 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin, somut olmayan kültürel mirasa ilişkin farkındalık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Kolay ulaşılabilir örneklem ile Karabük ilinin Safranbolu ilçesinde bir devlet okulunda öğrenim görmekte olan 4.sınıf öğrencilerinden belirlenen toplam 11 katılımcı ile araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda görüşme yapılmıştır. Araştırmada nitel verilerin analizinde betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin somut olmayan kültürel mirasa ilişkin farkındalık düzeylerinin sınırlı olduğu, geleneksel çocuk oyunları dışında öğrencilerin neredeyse tamamının somut olmayan kültürel mirasa ilişkin farkındalıklarının bulunmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it