MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997599893 · doi:10.36834/cmej.57011

Black Ice: Eight ways to get a grip on implementing mindfulness sessions in medical schools

2019· article· en· W2997599893 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tatiana Rac, Anita Chakravarti

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Education Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatchewan HealthSaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindfulnessConstruct (python library)Medical educationCurriculumStrengths and weaknessesProcess (computing)Foundation (evidence)PsychologyEngineering ethicsComputer scienceMedicinePedagogyEngineeringPolitical sciencePsychotherapistSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many medical colleges have explored mindfulness practice sessions to help their medical students cope with the demands of training.
 Many potential pitfalls can be addressed ahead of time with advance knowledge and appropriate planning. By sharing of challenges, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses of our collective experiences, we may be able to construct a foundation from which different institutions will be able to create MPS accessible and relevant to their needs.
 We discuss the process of developing sustainable mindfulness curricula in health science colleges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Education JournalSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207