MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997603461 · doi:10.1287/moor.2019.1048

Resistant Sets in the Unit Hypercube

2020· article· en· W2997603461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCommutative Algebra and Its Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIdeal (ethics)MathematicsClass (philosophy)HypercubeCombinatoricsConjectureComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ideal matrices and clutters are prevalent in combinatorial optimization, ranging from balanced matrices, clutters of T-joins, to clutters of rooted arborescences. Most of the known examples of ideal clutters are combinatorial in nature. In this paper, rendered by the recently developed theory of cuboids, we provide a different class of ideal clutters, one that is geometric in nature. The advantage of this new class of ideal clutters is that it allows for infinitely many ideal minimally nonpacking clutters. We characterize the densest ideal minimally nonpacking clutters of the class. Using the tools developed, we then verify the replication conjecture for the class.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.456
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it