Financial Development and Income Inequality in the Selected Southern African Development Community Countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tradisi Bajapuik merupakan bagian dari adat perkawinan masyarakat Pariaman yang masih dipraktikkan hingga saat ini. Seiring perkembangan sosial, pelaksanaannya mengalami berbagai penyesuaian sehingga perlu dikaji dari perspektif hukum Islam, khususnya melalui pendekatan Maqasid asy-Syari‘ah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mendeskripsikan penerapan tradisi Bajapuik dalam adat pernikahan masyarakat Nagari III Koto Aur Malintang, Kecamatan IV Koto Aur Malintang, Kabupaten Padang Pariaman; dan (2) menganalisis tradisi tersebut berdasarkan teori Maqasid asy-Syari‘ah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan tradisi Bajapuik tidak bertentangan dengan hukum Islam serta mengalami perubahan sesuai perkembangan zaman. Dalam perspektif Maqāṣid asy-Syari‘ah, tradisi ini termasuk kategori ḥājiyyat yang mendukung tujuan pokok perkawinan dalam kategori ḍaruriyyat, khususnya perlindungan terhadap keturunan (hifz al-nasl). Sementara itu, besaran mahar dan uang Bajapuik berada pada tingkat tahsiniyyat yang bertujuan memuliakan perempuan, menghormati laki-laki, serta menjaga agama, jiwa, akal, keturunan, dan harta
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".