Financial Sector Development and Poverty Alleviation in the SADC Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial development is widely regarded as another conduit through which poverty can be reduced.The study empirically examines the relationship between financial sector development and poverty reduction in SADC countries utilising the Generalised Method of Moments technique for the period 1980 to 2017.The empirical results indicate that the effect of the different measures of financial sector development on poverty in the SADC region is mixed.Six out of nine financial development variables have a negative effect on poverty in the SADC region.In terms of financial depth, the empirical results reveal mixed outcomes.Results on financial system stability confirm the notion that a stable financial system is beneficial to the poor.The results also reveal that financial inclusion or access to financial services significantly reduces poverty in the SADC region.The results thus suggest that financial sector development is beneficial to the poor when it is inclusive and stable.The results imply that policies aimed at ensuring a stable financial system, which is also inclusive, should be pursued if the poor are to benefit from the financial system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".