MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997659868 · doi:10.21037/apm.2019.12.05

Plasma parameters and risk factors of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment

2020· article· en· W2997659868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ji‐Xia Wu, Jian Xue, Lei Zhuang, Chun-Feng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineStroke (engine)DementiaOdds ratioConfidence intervalBlood pressureHomocysteineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPhysical therapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It is high of the incidence of stroke and dementia with the advent of an aging society. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is one of the common complications of stroke, which not only seriously affects the life quality of patients, but also significantly reduces the survival time of stroke patients. Moreover, it also brings in heavy burden to the family and society. The development of vascular dementia could be reduced by early intervention after stroke. Management of vascular risk factors could be an effective way to prevent dementia. This study aimed to investigate the plasma biochemical parameters of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and its potential risk factors. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients with ischaemic stroke were included and followed up for 3 years. Among these patients, 132 cases were diagnosed as PSCI. The cognitive impairment of patients with PSCI was assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination and Montreal cognitive assessment scale. The plasma biochemical parameters and blood coagulation, as well as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of all the patients after admission, were measured. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses revealed that increased age, carotid plaque, cerebral atrophy, white matter lesions (WML), alcohol use, smoking and history of systolic blood pressure ≥170 mmHg was highly associated with PSCI (P<0.05). Elevated homocysteine, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and uric acid were also highly associated with PSCI. Logistic regression analysis identified five risk factors correlated with PSCI including alcohol use [odds ratio (OR): 5.138, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.014-26.04, P=0.048], history of high systolic blood pressure (OR: 12.171, 95% CI: 3.339-44.363, P=0.001), carotid plaque (OR: 1.692, 95% CI: 1.032-2.796, P=0.040), cerebral atrophy (OR: 2.280, 95% CI: 1.294-4.001, P=0.004), and WML (OR: 3.155, 95% CI: 1.868-5.324, P=0.001). Three plasma biochemical parameters were also associated with PSCI including homocysteine (OR: 1.018, 95% CI: 0.944-1.042, P=0.010), and LDL (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.6-1.148, P=0.051), and uric acid (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.998-1.002, P=0.007). The area under the receiver operating curve for the risk factors of PSCI was 0.821 with the sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 71.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated homocysteine, LDL, and uric acid were highly related to PSCI, which may help predict PSCI. These plasma biochemical parameters together with vascular risk factors, may improve the sensitivity for early detection of PSCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207