Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cavity magnonics is an emerging field that studies the strong coupling between cavity photons and collective spin excitations such as magnons. This rapidly developing field connects some of the most exciting branches of modern physics, such as quantum information and quantum optics, with one of the oldest sciences on Earth, the magnetism. The past few years have seen a steady stream of exciting experiments that demonstrate novel magnon-based transducers and memories. Most of such cavity magnonic devices rely on coherent coupling that stems from the direct dipole–dipole interaction. Recently, a distinct dissipative magnon–photon coupling was discovered. In contrast to coherent coupling that leads to level repulsion between hybridized modes, dissipative coupling results in level attraction. It opens an avenue for engineering and harnessing losses in hybrid systems. This article gives a brief review of this new frontier. Experimental observations of level attraction are reviewed. Different microscopic mechanisms are compared. Based on such experimental and theoretical reviews, we present an outlook for developing open cavity systems by engineering and harnessing dissipative couplings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it