MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997689857 · doi:10.1183/13993003.02217-2019

Looking at the COPD spectrum through “PRISm”

2020· letter· en· W2997689857 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Adibi, Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOPDSpirometryMedicineVital capacityObstructive lung diseaseCardiologyPulmonary diseaseInternal medicineGold standard (test)Cause of deathDiseaseLung functionLungAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COPD is a major burden globally. According to the Global Burden of Disease study, COPD caused 3.2 million deaths in 2015, accounting for 5% of all deaths worldwide, making it the third leading cause of death in the world [1]. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) defines spirometrically confirmed COPD based on a forced expiratory volume during the first second (FEV1) to a forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio smaller than 0.7 [2]. The severity of airflow obstruction is further defined through GOLD severity grades based on the ratio of FEV1 to its predicted value, with GOLD 1, 2, 3 and 4 defined around cut-off points of 80%, 50%, and 30% [2]. Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a prevalent, neglected condition whose prognosis is close to that of COPD

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0280.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207