MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997701418 · doi:10.51656/psycause.v9i2.20157

Attachement, personnalité et violence conjugale psychologique chez des femmes en psychothérapie

2019· article· fr· W2997701418 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gabrielle Cloutier, Marie-Chloé Nolin, Laurence Côté, Stéphane Sabourin, Vincent Bellemare

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université Laval · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Puisque la violence conjugale psychologique (VCP) perpétrée par les femmes représente une problématique ayant une importante prévalence, la présente étude vise à expliquer le lien entre les deux dimensions de l’attachement et la VCP via les traits de la personnalité. L’échantillon est composé de femmes consultant en thérapie individuelle ou de couple au Service de consultation de l’École de psychologie de l’Université Laval qui ont rempli des questionnaires mesurant l’attachement, les traits de la personnalité et la VCP. L’analyse effectuée afin de tester les hypothèses est l’analyse acheminatoire. L’agréabilité s’est avérée être un médiateur significatif du lien entre l’anxiété d’abandon et la VCP et du lien entre l’évitement de l’intimité et la VCP, alors que l’extraversion est un médiateur du lien entre l’évitement de l’intimité et la VCP. Le modèle comprenant les deux dimensions de l’attachement et les cinq traits de la personnalité explique 12 % des variations de la VCP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université LavalSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207