Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’œuvre demontre l’importance des images dans le reveil culturel des Inuit et ce qu'elles apportent en termes de memoire collective. L’auteur analyse les films de Jean Malaurie et etudie ses temoignages sur la crise culturelle vecue par les Inuit dans les annees 1970. Elle conclut que ces films doivent etre au service des populations etudiees elles-memes, tant sur le plan prive que public. Le debat sur la propriete et les droits d'auteur confirme cette opinion car ces derniers empechent finalement les populations etudiees de mieux se connaitre et de se reconstruire. Les Inuit n'ont que des droits limites sur les documentaires et les films qui parlent d'eux. Ce sont les droits d’auteurs instaures par les Occidentaux qui empechent les Inuit d’avoir acces a ces films. Par consequent, l’auteur propose que ces films soient consideres comme des biens publics culturels inuit et qu’ils soient ainsi partages avec les institutions et universites arctiques afin d'etre mis a la disposition des peuples qui les ont inspires. Ce geste genereux, un bon exemple pour les autres realisateurs, ethnologues, apporterait une toute autre dimension a l'heritage des œuvres visuelles de Jean Malaurie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".