MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997744693 · doi:10.25011/cim.v42i4.33109

Exposing HIV-1 Env: Implications for therapeutic strategies

2019· article· en· W2997744693 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Andrés Finzi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthUniversité de MontréalCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirologyMedicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein trimer (Env) is exposed on the surfaces of both virions and infected cells. Thus, Env is the principal target for neutralizing antibodies and antibodies able to mediate antibodydependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The HIV-1 Env is a flexible molecule known to exist in at least three different conformational states: states 1, 2 and 3. Before interacting with the primary receptor, CD4, Env preferentially adopts a compact, "closed" conformation (state 1) that is largely antibody-resistant. The CD4 binding "opens" Env increasing the vulnerability of infected cells to ADCC mediated by non-neutralizing antibodies, as these easily-elicited antibodies preferentially recognize epitopes exposed in the open conformational states (states 2/3). These antibodies include the anti-coreceptor binding site and the anti-cluster A families of antibodies that, in combination with small CD4-mimetic compounds, stabilize a new asymmetric Env conformation (state 2A) that is vulnerable to ADCC. Approaches aimed at stabilizing this "open" conformation represent new interventional approaches to fight HIV-1 infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207