Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The principles of mass, momentum and energy conservation are fundamental to quantitative hydrology. Physically based models in hydrology respect these principles, in contrast to many statistical models, which may not. These conservation principles are most clearly expressed when written as mathematical equations. One may view mathematics as a “grammar” and “language” to communicate the “literature” of physical principles. In this chapter, we shall therefore focus mostly upon the mathematical development of the conservation principles and their manifestation in hydrology. In this way, we hope that our development will give physical meaning to the fundamental hydrologic equations. We will assume that reader has an elementary understanding of multivariate calculus and differential equations. We first state the fundamental principles and then outline the general ways that mathematical expressions for these principles are formulated. We then develop general mathematical equations for each principle for the specific case of a flowing fluid, which in hydrology is usually water. These general equations are typically then used as the basis for expressions used in hydrology. We conclude the chapter with a sequence of examples from hydrology to show how the principles are manifest in expressions that describe hydrologic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".