The geriatric pain experience in mice: intact cutaneous thresholds but altered responses to tonic and chronic pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Older individuals have an elevated risk for chronic pain as half of all individuals over 65 years old have at least one chronic pain condition. Unfortunately, relevant assessment tools and recommendations for chronic pain management targeting older adults are lacking. This study explores changes in response to pain between young (2-3 months old) and geriatric (20-24 months old) ages using mice. Although cutaneous thresholds to brisk stimuli (von Frey and radiant heat assays) were not affected, behavioral responses to tonic stimuli (acetone and capsaicin assays) were more pronounced in geriatric animals. After nerve injury, geriatric mice present an altered neuropathic pain profile with hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli but not acetone and an impairment in conditioned noxious stimuli avoidance. This altered behavioral response pattern was associated with an abnormal monoaminergic signature in the medial prefrontal cortex, suggesting decreased COMT function. We conclude that young and geriatric mice exhibit different behavioral and physiological responses to the experience of pain, suggesting that knowledge and practices must be adjusted for geriatric populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".