MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997783990 · doi:10.1155/2019/1628417

Pattern Recognition Using Clustering Analysis to Support Transportation System Management, Operations, and Modeling

2019· article· en· W2997783990 on OpenAlex
Rajib Saha, Mosammat Tahnin Tariq, Mohammed Hadi, Yan Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFlorida Department of TransportationU.S. Department of Transportation
KeywordsCluster analysisHierarchical clusteringPrincipal component analysisData miningComputer scienceIdentification (biology)MedoidArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been an increasing interest in recent years in using clustering analysis for the identification of traffic patterns that are representative of traffic conditions in support of transportation system operations and management (TSMO); integrated corridor management; and analysis, modeling, and simulation (AMS). However, there has been limited information to support agencies in their selection of the most appropriate clustering technique(s), associated parameters, the optimal number of clusters, clustering result analysis, and selecting observations that are representative of each cluster. This paper investigates and compares the use of a number of existing clustering methods for traffic pattern identifications, considering the above. These methods include the K-means, K-prototypes, K-medoids, four variations of the Hierarchical method, and the combination of Principal Component Analysis for mixed data (PCAmix) with K-means. Among these methods, the K-prototypes and K-means with PCs produced the best results. The paper then provides recommendations regarding conducting and utilizing the results of clustering analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it