El uso de la discapacidad en la escritura espiritual medieval: particularidades religiosas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disabled bodies, perceived as objects of curiosity, reflect a scenario in which cultural and religious stereotypes converge, creating and destroying notions surrounding the idea of malformation, reconfiguring social roles, and raising interesting questions regarding the disabled body and its place in the Spanish medieval world.In this way, this work invites a conversation regarding the symbiotic relationship between the disabled and the "other" in stories deeply imbued with mythological content and Christian spirituality.The goal of this analysis is to identify a correlation between the treatment given to a sick person and those who confess a creed distinct from that associated with the reader's set of beliefs.In order to understand how the narrative uses disability and how a disadvantage can be transformed into a virtue, we will examine two medieval works: Cantigas de Santa María by Alfonso X and Los Milagros de Nuestra Señora by Gonzalo de Berceo.The aim is to establish a link between religion and disability.We will consider both literary representation and certain illustrations from the Codice Rico, in which various forms of disability are depicted. KEywoRdSCantigas de Santa María, disability, iconography, Los Milagros de Nuestra Señora, Berceo, Alfonso X the Wise.El hombre medieval es consciente de su frágil vida y de que en su caminar en este mundo no se está solo, ya que diversos poderes sobrenaturales de carácter positivo lo ayudan a salvarse y le confieren la salud, mientras que los poderes de los demonios tratan de hacerlo caer en pecado mortal.Debido a la preocupación en las situaciones del mundo espiritual, el ser promedio de la Edad Media desarrolla una multitud de vínculos entre los fenómenos que no puede explicar racionalmente y la fe en lo sobrenatural.Lejos de ser una excepción, el espacio ibérico ve nacer una multitud de cuentos de carácter folclórico y religioso que apoyan y Petre Ene
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".