EM-Centric Multiphysics Optimization of Microwave Components Using Parallel Computational Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the high-performance microwave component and system design, besides electromagnetic (EM) physics domain, we also need to consider the operation of the real-world multiphysics (MP) environment that contains the effects of other physics domains. EM-centric MP analysis and design optimization become very important. In this article, for the first time, we develop a novel parallel EM-centric multiphysics optimization (MPO) technique. In our proposed technique, the pole/residue-based transfer function is exploited to build an effective and robust surrogate model. A group of modified quadratic mapping functions is formulated to map the relationships between pole/residues of the transfer function and the design variables. Multiple EM-centric MP evaluations are performed in parallel to generate the training samples for establishing the surrogate model. Using our proposed technique, the surrogate model can be valid in a relatively large neighborhood, which makes an effective and large optimization update in each optimization iteration. The trust region algorithm is performed to guarantee the convergence of the proposed MPO algorithm. Our proposed MPO technique takes a small number of iterations to obtain the optimal EM-centric MP response. Two microwave filter examples are used to demonstrate the validity of the proposed technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".