Analisis Dependensi Faktor Makroekonomi terhadap Tingkat Harga Emas Dunia dengan Pendekatan Copula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gold is a precious metal that used many times as an alternative investment. Before investing, every investor requires relevant information to make profitable investment decisions. Relevant information can be obtained by looking at the dependency relationship between variables. In identifying the relationship between variables, a Copula approach could be used, since it is not tight against the assumption of normality, which is common in macroeconomic variables. Copula used were Archimedean Copula family, such as Clayton, Frank, and Gumbel. The results of this study indicated that the Archimedean Copula of the Frank family is the best Copula models to explain the structure of dependencies between gold and each composite stock price index and exchange rate, with each parameter obtained were 2.286 and -2.2390, respectively, while Clayton Copula family was the best Copula models to explain the structure of dependencies between gold and oil, with parameter obtained was 3.4090.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".