MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WildFireSat - unlocking the potential for a global WildFire monitoring service

2019· article· en· W2997926576 on OpenAlexaffabout
Helena van Mierlo, Joshua M. Johnston, Didier Davignon, Linh Ngo Phong, Natasha Jackson, Catherine Casgrain

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversidade Brasileira · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Environmental resource managementRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To increase its capability to monitor wildland fires, the Government of Canada has initiated the first step of the development of a satellite system dedicated to wildfire monitoring. This system, called WildFireSat, will provide data for the whole of Canada on a daily basis, more specifically in the afternoon when fire activity is at its peak. Data users such as the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) for wildfire management purposes, and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) for carbon emission reporting and smoke and air quality forecasting purposes, will have access to the data within 30 min of data acquisition. Apart from its direct benefits,WildFireSat is meant to serve as a steppingstone towards the achievement of a longer-term goal: the realization of a future, potentially commercial, satellite constellation that would provide global, continuous, near real-time wildfire monitoring services. WildFireSat could help prepare the user community in Canada and possibly abroad, and thus create the user base that would be needed to make a strong business case for a future global operational wildfire monitoring data service. Other nations are welcomed to join the WildFireSat initiative and to help pave the way towards a global, continuous, near real-time wildfire monitoring service in collaboration with the international community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversidade BrasileiraSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207