MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997935898 · doi:10.1364/ol.385246

Universal self-similar asymptotic behavior of optical bump spreading in random medium atop incoherent background

2019· article· en· W2997935898 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaofei Li, Sergey A. Ponomarenko, Zhiheng Xu, Fei Wang, Yangjian Cai, Chunhao Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersInnovation Group of JinanChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOpticsPhysicsCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)GaussianIsotropyIntensity (physics)HomogeneousCoherence timeSpatial coherenceStatistical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his comment [Opt. Lett.45, 3510 (2020)OPLEDP10.1364/OL.385246], Charnotskii claims that the cross-spectral densities recently studied in Opt. Lett.45, 698 (2020)OPLEDP10.1364/OL.385246 of partially coherent beams atop a statistical background do not satisfy the non-negative definiteness requirement. We argue that Charnotskii's claim stems from his misunderstanding of the non-negative definiteness concept as applied to the model of Opt. Lett.45, 698 (2020)OPLEDP10.1364/OL.385246.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207