Hacer memoria de la defensa de los presos políticos de México desde una perspectiva soslayada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las memorias de los movimientos sociales son resultado de un proceso colectivo, sin embargo, la subjetividad de quienes fueron partícipes y protagonistas parte de una mirada única. La defensa de los derechos humanos en México tiene sus orígenes en el marco del movimiento armado socialista. Surgió por la iniciativa de mujeres familiares de presos políticos en el contexto de la llamada Guerra Sucia (1964-1982). En este artículo, rescatamos esta génesis y abordamos los orígenes y el proceso organizativo del primer Comité de Familiares de Presos, Perseguidos y Exiliados Políticos a partir de una entrevista en profundidad con una de sus fundadoras, Blanca Hernández. El rescate de la memoria de este comité hasta ahora soslayado, pionero en la defensa de los derechos humanos en México, permite destacar su rol histórico y resaltar las memorias de una de sus líderes y pioneras a partir de sus vivencias en diversas luchas subyacentes. Con este fin, se abordan tres dimensiones clave del origen y la trayectoria de este comité: el contexto sociopolítico en el cual surgió; las dinámicas que están detrás de la formación de estructuras de movilización y las estrategias de acción que desarrollaron, así como las dinámicas de género latentes y, finalmente, el marco de significación con base en el cual se movilizaron: los derechos humanos. Abstract: Social movements’ memories are the result of a collective process, while simultaneously the subjectivity of its members and protagonists emerge from unique perspectives. The defense of human rights in Mexico originated in the context of the socialist armed movement. It emerged as an initiative instigated by female relatives of political prisoners during the so-called Dirty War (1964-1982). In this article, we address the origins and organizational process of the first committee of relatives of the political prisoners, the persecuted and the exiled through an in-depth interview with one of its founders, Blanca Hernández. By reconstructing the memory of this pioneering committee in the defense of human rights in Mexico, this paper uncovers the committee’s historical role while underlining the memories of one of its pioneering leaders through her experiences in various struggles. We discuss three central dimensions of the origin and trajectory of this committee: the sociopolitical context in which it emerged; the dynamics behind the mobilization structures and strategies of collective action, as well as the underlying gender dynamics; and finally, the frame on which the movement mobilized, that of human rights. Keywords: subjective memories, political prisoners, committee of relatives, dirty war, Mexico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".