MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The <scp>REE</scp> s in Hydrothermal Systems

2019· other· en· W2998046777 on OpenAlexaff
Artas Migdisov, Hongwu Xu, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones, Joël Brugger

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Water · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrothermal circulationLanthanideAqueous solutionRare earthDeposition (geology)ChemistryEarth scienceGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceNanotechnologyChemical engineeringMineralogyGeologyMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extensive use of the rare earth elements (REEs, mostly represented by the lanthanide group from La to Lu) in renewable energy applications and defense‐related technologies triggered high and growing interest to the processes responsible for migration, separation, and concentration of these elements in natural processes. Understanding these processes and the behavior of REEs in them is essential for exploration of new resources of these elements and efficient use of REEs in industrial applications. There is now an almost universal agreement that hot aqueous fluids play a significant and, in some cases, a dominant role in concentration and separation of REEs in nature. This article reviews high‐temperature experimental data collected over the past 15 years on the stability of the REE aqueous species and minerals and discusses the mechanisms responsible for hydrothermal transport and deposition of the REEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of WaterSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207