MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998074154 · doi:10.4000/memini.1359

Des manuscrits d’ici et d’ailleurs. Le comte de Flandre, l’histoire et l’Orient latin dans la seconde moitié du xiiie siècle

2019· article· fr· W2998074154 on OpenAlexaffvenue
S. Plante

Bibliographic record

VenueMemini · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval History and Crusades
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction Pendant leur âge d’or de plus ou moins deux siècles, les États latins d’Orient ont constitué un carrefour d’échanges d’une vigueur impressionnante où des gens, des langues et des cultures de l’Est comme de l’Ouest ont pu se rencontrer et s’enrichir d’une influence mutuelle qui bénéficie aujourd’hui d’une attention critique largement méritée. De tous les acteurs impliqués dans ce brassage culturel, je me propose d’aborder le cas du comté de Flandre, et plus spécifiquement celui...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeminiSame topicMedieval History and CrusadesFrench-language works237,207