MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wood <sup>ST</sup> : A Temperature-Dependent Plastic-Damage Constitutive Model Used for Numerical Simulation of Wood-Based Materials and Connections

2019· article· en· W2998083228 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyFPInnovations
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminated veneer lumberMaterials scienceHardening (computing)BrittlenessConstitutive equationStructural engineeringStrain hardening exponentComputer simulationSofteningComposite materialFinite element methodVeneerEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermomechanical behavior of members and connections plays a crucial role in the fire safety of timber construction. In this study, a unique constitutive model, WoodST, combining a number of mechanics-based submodels was developed for numerical simulation of wood-based materials and connections under forces and fire. The extended Yamada–Sun strength criteria were utilized to judge the brittle failure or ductile yielding in different directions and stress conditions. A strain-based damage evolution was developed to describe the postpeak softening of brittle failure in tension or shear. A plastic flow and a hardening law were established based on the strength criteria to depict the plastic stress-strain relationship of ductile yielding in compression. A strain-based hardening evolution was developed to implement a second hardening (densification) under compression perpendicular to grain. A multilinear reduction model was adopted to represent the influence of fire on the mechanical properties of wood-based materials. The developed model was used to model the structural response of a laminated veneer lumber (LVL) beam and a glulam bolted connection under force and fire. It is demonstrated that the proposed constitutive model was capable of simulating the thermomechanical response of LVL beam and glulam connection under force and fire within 10% difference between modeling and testing results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it