Конотативний зріз термінів шовінізм та фанатизм у публіцистиці Дмитра Донцова
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An overview of the stylistic resources of the Ukrainian language would be incomplete without the texts of the main ideologist of the Ukrainian nationalism, Dmytro Dontsov, since some terms-notions in Dmitriy Dontsov's journalistic texts receive new connotative coloring due to the author's definitions. The article analyzes the phenomenon of transition of the linguistic units of one style to another in the linguistic reality. It has been revealed that the terms in the journalistic texts of Dmytro Dontsov are emotionally colored due to the author’s definitions and the use of numerous tropes (metaphors, antitheses, comparisons). New semantic shades of terms in the works of D. Dontsov contribute to better ideological understanding of the basic political realities. The case study proves that the terms chauvinism and fanaticism are considered in all sources as negative only, so it is worth analyzing the interpretation of these concepts not only in the scientific literature, but also in journalism, which influences the formation of the reader’s position and is an effective factor in the creation of political thinking. In addition, it is impossible to give definitely negative assessment of the terms that are still functioning in the Ukrainian politics. The study has revealed that the attributive modifiers for the terms chauvinism and fanaticism used in the texts of the Tribune of the Nation do not coincide with the attributive modifiers fixed in the dictionaries and the political science and philosophy research papers. The author argues that the retrospective review of socio-political terms, which after the collapse of the USSR Empire returned to the cultural heritage of an independent state, is obviously an important issue. It is proved that the emotional texts of Dmytro Dontsov are the basis for the formation of a state-building outlook of the citizens and the basis for the theoretical understanding of the contemporary socio-political problems. Key words: socio-political terms, chauvinism, fanaticism, Dmytro Dontsov, connotation. References Bahan, Oleh. Aktualna natsiosofiia: teoretychni, kulturolohichni, heopolitychni ta istoriosofski aspekty. Lviv: Piramida, 2016. Bahan, Oleh. Pomizh mistykoiu i politykoiu (Dmytro Dontsov na tli ukrainskoi politychnoi istorii pershoi polovyny XX st.). Kyiv, 2008. Bashnianyn, Hryhorii, Myslovskyi, Petro, Shevchyk, Bohdan, and Pasichnyk, Vasyl. Ukrainska natsionalna ideia: polityko-ekonomichnyi ta istoryko-sotsialnyi analiz. Lviv: Liha-Pres, 2018. Homza, Ivan. Suspilno-politychni rukhy. Kyiv, 2018. Hrytsak, Yaroslav. Narys istorii Ukrainy: formuvannia modernoi ukrainskoi natsii XIX – XX st. Kyiv: Heneza, 1996. Dontsov, Dmytro. Dukh nashoi davnyny. Lviv–Kyiv: Nakladom Yuriia Kryvoruchka, 2011. Dontsov, Dmytro. Yedyne, shcho ye na potrebu. Kyiv: Diokor, 2002. Dontsov, Dmytro. Natsionalizm. Vinnytsia: DP “DKF”, 2006. Dontsov, Dmytro. Khrestom i mechem. Ternopil: Rada, 2010. Kasianov, Heorhii. Teorii natsii ta natsionalizmu. Kyiv: Lybid, 1999. Kvit, Serhii. Dmytro Dontsov: ideolohichnyi portret. 2nd ed. Lviv: Halytska vydavnycha spilka, 2013. Korotkyi oksfordskyi politychnyi slovnyk, edited by I. Maklina, A. Makmilana; translated by V. Sydorov, D. Tarashchuk and all. Kyiv: Osnovy, 2005. Kuzyk, Petro. Natsionalizm i shovinizm u mizhnarodnykh vidnosynakh. 2nd ed. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 2003. Kuzyk, Petro. Nationalism and Chauvinism in International relations. PhD Thesis Abstract. Lviv, 2004. Lisovyi, Vasyl. Kultura – ideolohiia – polityka. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo im. Oleny Telihy, 1997. Maneliuk, Yurii, and Chubur Nataliia. Suchasni ideino-politychni techii. Kyiv: KNEU, 2010. Mykytiuk, Oksana. “Suspilno-politychna terminolohiia Dmytra Dontsova yak osnova ukrainskykh derzhavotvirnykh tradytsii”. Kunch, Zoriana, Nakonechna, Halyna, Mykytiuk, Oksana, Bulyk-Verkhola, Sofiia, Tehlivets, Yuliia. Teoriia termina: konkretyzatsiia leksyko-semantychnykh paradyhm. Lviv: Halytska Vydavnycha Spilka, 2018, pp. 67–90. Novostavska, Oksana. “Paradigmatical Relations (Synonymy and Antonymy) in the Ivan Franko’s System of Philosophical Terms”. Ukrainska mova, no 2, 2013, pp. 68–75. Panochko, Mykhailo. “Ukrainian social and political terminology of the end of 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. Lexicographical aspect”. Research Journal of Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series “Philology” (Linguistics), no 7, 2017, pp. 133–6. Panko, Tamila. Vid termina do systemy. Lviv, 1979. Panko, Tamila, Kochan, Iryna, and Matsiuk, Halyna. Ukrainske terminoznavstvo. Lviv: Svit, 1994. Sosnovskyi, Mykhailo. Dmytro Dontsov – politychnyi portret: Z istorii rozvytku ideolohii ukrainskoho natsionalizmu. Niu-York–Toronto, 1974. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy, edited by I. K. Bilodid. 11 vols. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1970–1980. Ukrainska mova u XX storichchi: istoriia linhvotsydu. Dokumenty i materialy. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”, 2005. Сhugujеnkо, Mykhailo. Тhе Fоrmаtiоn аnd Develорmеnt D. Dоntсоv’s Idеоlоgу. PhD Thesis Abstract. Kharkiv, 1998. Shveda, Yurii. Politychni partii: entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. Lviv: Astroliabiia, 2005. Coleman, Heather, Hrytsak, Yaroslav, Hundorova, Tamara, Zaitsev, Oleksandr and Shkandrij, Myroslav. A roundtable on Myroslav Shkandrij’s Ukrainian Nationalism: Politics, Ideology, and Literature, 1929–1956. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2017.1319619.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".