Dorure et redorure de la statuaire antique en bronze : une nouvelle lecture de l’Apollon de Lillebonne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Apollon de Lillebonne est, à ce jour, la plus grande sculpture de bronze représentant une divinité, découverte en Gaule romaine. Datée stylistiquement du iie siècle de notre ère, la statue, qui figure un Apollon lyricine, provient de l’antique Juliobona (Lillebonne, Normandie). Divinité salutaire, il s’agit très vraisemblablement d’une statue de culte. Une première étude de laboratoire avait été menée lors d’une campagne de restauration en 1974-1975 sous la direction d’Albert France-Lanord. Une exploration scientifique complémentaire, conduite au C2RMF en 2015, a apporté des informations inédites sur le contexte de présentation de l’Apollon dans l’Antiquité. Elle a permis surtout de caractériser la technique de dorure du bronze et aussi de mettre en évidence une importante phase de redorure antique. L’étude de la dorure a fait appel à diverses techniques d’examens et d’analyses : métallographie, microscopie 3D, spectrométrie de fluorescence X, microscopie électronique à balayage et à effet de champ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".