Community Development Program Arisan Jamban di Dukuh Sebatang, Desa Hargotirto, Kulonprogo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dukuh Sebatang is selected as the locations of the Menyapa Indonesia program.The results of various surveys showed that there were 166 of 200 households still categorized as poor families.To help improve the welfare of people lives in dukuh Sebatang, the team introduced the empowerment and development of dukuh that is oriented to four key areas the health sector, economic, education and culture, and infrastructure.This study aims to said how the community development in the field of health by awardee LPDP PK-41.Qualitative descriptive method was used in this study.Researchers looking for informants snow-ball technique, observation and study documentation as secondary data.The result of this program the achievement of the privy development targets.Through the program of arisan jamban the community can play an active role in building and maintaining health facilities in the form of a healthy privy resulting in the public health at the dukuh Sebatang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".