MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998174999 · doi:10.7203/celestinesca.43.20247

<i>La Celestina</i> en la Transición. Censura, polémica e interpretación de la recreación telefílmica de Juan Guerrero Zamora

2019· article· es· W2998174999 on OpenAlex
José Eduardo Villalobos Graillet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCelestinesca · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Journalism, and Communication History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo se propone examinar, en primer lugar, los problemas que atravesó el guion de la recreación cinematográfica basada en La Celestina de Juan Guerrero Zamora durante el franquismo. Para ello, se analiza el expediente de censura depositado actualmente en el Archivo General de la Administración (Alcalá de Henares). En segundo, la polémica que se generó en los periódicos españoles cuando el proyecto finalmente llegó a producirse para la televisión en la etapa de la transición hacia la democracia. Como se mencionará, parte de ello se debió a que en ese entonces TVE buscaba crear una nueva imagen de anticorrupción en los telespectadores e, indirectamente, provocar la salida del realizador del medio. Y, por último, el tratamiento libre y personalizado que el director dio a la adaptación de esta obra clásica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it