MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998181375 · doi:10.18280/ts.360609

Wavelet-Based Self-adaptive Hierarchical Thresholding Algorithm and Its Application in Image Denoising

2019· article· en· W2998181375 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianhua Zhang, Qiang Zhu, Lin Song

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Province
KeywordsThresholdingImage denoisingNoise reductionArtificial intelligenceWaveletPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceImage (mathematics)Non-local meansAlgorithmStep detectionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper attempts to construct a suitable wavelet for image denoising based on wavelet thresholding algorithm. First, the author discussed how image thresholding is affected by the wavelet orthogonality and bi-orthogonality, the features of vanishing moments and the odd or even symmetry of the decomposition end filter. The discussion shows that the most desirable wavelet for image denoising is the biorthogonal wavelet, in which the decomposition end filter has zero point even symmetry, the low-pass decomposition enjoys a wide support interval, and the high-pass decomposition filter has a short support and attenuates fast. On this basis, three zero point even symmetric biorthogonal wavelets with different vanishing moment features were developed through the parametric construction of fixed-length tightly-supported (FLTS) biorthogonal wavelet, and a self-adaptive hierarchical thresholding algorithm was designed. The simulation results show that the developed wavelets have excellent denoising ability and enhance the images with rich details. Coupled with the self-adaptive hierarchical thresholding algorithm, these wavelets can effectively improve the image quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207