Effect of vision therapy on measures of oculomotor function of patients presenting with post-concussion syndrome
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oculomotor dysfunction is a common symptom of post-concussion syndrome (PCS). By use of a retrospective analysis approach, the efficacy of Vision Therapy (VT) for the treatment of PCS related symptoms of the visual system was investigated. Overall, 56 patients were selected for inclusion in this study, all of which presented with clinical impairment of at least one measure of oculomotor functioning. Activities related to VT were wide-ranging and case-dependent, but all aimed to improve one of the five main areas of visual function. Following completion of VT, all patients demonstrated statistically or clinically significant improvements, as defined by use of Morgan’s Norms, in at least one measure of oculomotor functioning related to PCS. In general, improvements in measures of oculomotor functioning were greatest for near point of convergence, vergence facility and accommodative facility. Patients receiving 20 sessions of VT had improved and less variable outcomes when compared to those receiving 5-10 sessions of VT. In addition, VT was found to improve symptoms of visual discomfort in patients presenting with PCS. Results of this retrospective analysis demonstrate significant improvements in measured outcomes for all patients receiving VT and support VT as a treatment option for symptoms of PCS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it