MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998324778 · doi:10.21037/aoj.2019.12.10

Contemporary surgical approaches for hip resurfacing

2020· article· en· W2998324778 on OpenAlex
Adriana Martinez Gomez, George Grammatopoulos, Paul E. Beaulé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Joint · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHip resurfacingMedicineSurgeryFemoral headArthroplastySurgical proceduresBlood supplyTotal hip arthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty have evolved and improved dramatically as surgical procedures in the last decade; allowing for improvement of patient function and quality of life. A better understanding of biomaterials, biomechanics; as well as, surgical approaches have minimized time to recovery, improved implants’ survival and decreased complications. In particular hip resurfacing as a bone conservation technique, has specific considerations when selecting the surgical approach and surgical instruments affecting the success of the surgery and the outcome in the young, active patient. We present a review of surgical approaches for hip resurfacing, considering that these approaches are also performed for total hip arthroplasty, however they are adjusted or modified for hip resurfacing with special considerations to preserving femoral head blood supply as well as proper component orientation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.409
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.063 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it