MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998344372 · doi:10.21810/sfuer.v12i3.1018

Internacionalização e Políticas Linguísticas: Análise dos Elementos de Conceituação e das Ações Presentes no Plano de Internacionalização da Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

2019· article· pt· W2998344372 on OpenAlex
Kleber M. Silva, Lauro Sérgio Machado Pereira, Iara Teixeira de Araújo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSFU Educational Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsInternationalization of Higher EducationPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophyHigher educationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A internacionalização, movimento decorrente da globalização, tem demandado que os sistemas educacionais de diversos país realizem processos de cooperação bilateral e multilateral, bem como estimulem novas formas de regulação de suas políticas educacionais. Em vista disso, considerando o contexto da elaboração de políticas linguísticas para a promoção da internacionalização do Ensino Superior brasileiro como ação que colabora com os resultados das avaliações às quais sãos submetidas as universidades, apresentamos algumas considerações a respeito das perspectivas teóricas da internacionalização do Ensino Superior e estabelecemos um diálogo com o construto de políticas linguísticas. Em seguida, descrevemos e analisamos os elementos que compõem a conceituação de internacionalização e de política linguística presentes no Plano de Internacionalização (PI) da Universidade de Brasília (UnB), vigente de 2018 a 2022, no sentido de compreender a perspectiva a partir da qual esse documento apresenta as ações e as metas a serem executadas nos âmbitos do ensino, da pesquisa e da extensão. Essa investigação qualitativa aplicou a metodologia de análise de conteúdo, por essa adotar normas sistemáticas de extrair os significados temáticos de um texto com a finalidade de interpretá-lo objetivamente. Os resultados indicaram que o PI da UnB apresenta uma conceituação de internacionalização e de política linguística socio-culturalmente situadas, pois as metas do documento em questão se propõem a responder questões pontuais referentes à elevação dos índices de desenvolvimento da educação brasileira na atualidade.
 
 Internationalization, a movement resulting from globalization, has demanded that the educational systems of various countries undertake bilateral and multilateral cooperation processes, as well as stimulate new forms of regulation of their educational policies. In view of this, considering the context of the elaboration of language policies to promote the internationalization of Brazilian education as an action that collaborates with the results of the evaluations to which the universities are submitted, we present some considerations about the theoretical perspectives of the internationalization of higher education and we establish a dialogue with the language policy construct. Then, we describe and analyze the elements that make up the conceptualization of internationalization and language policies present in the Internationalization Plan (IP) of the University of Brasília (UnB), in force from 2018 to 2022, in order to understand the perspective from which this document presents the actions and goals to be implemented in the areas of education, research and service. This qualitative investigation applied the content analysis methodology, since it adopts systematic norms to extract the thematic meanings of a text in order to interpret it objectively. The results indicated that UnB's IP presents a socio-culturally situated conceptualization of internationalization and language policies, since the goals of the document propose to answer specific issues for the increase in the development rates of Brazilian education today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it