Clinicopathologic Characterization of Hidradenoma on Acral Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hidradenomas are benign sweat gland tumors that typically present as small nodules in adulthood. Their anatomic distribution is wide and rarely includes acral sites. In this setting, reliable separation from digital papillary adenocarcinoma is important, but notoriously difficult. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of 25 hidradenomas on acral skin were retrieved. The clinical presenting features and morphologic findings were recorded, and follow-up was obtained. Immunohistochemistry was performed for AE1/3, CK5/6, EMA, CEA, SMA, S100, p40, and p63. The tumors presented as solitary nodules on the hands (n=17) and feet (n=8) of adults (age range: 20 to 81 y; median: 50 y), with an equal sex distribution. Histologically, the well-circumscribed tumors were lobular, with a solid and cystic growth within dermis. Duct and squamous differentiation and vascularized hyaline stroma were frequent. The majority (n=18) were poroid hidradenomas. Scattered cytologic atypia and mitotic activity (median: 2/10 HPF) were common, and a pseudoinfiltrative growth of strands in a hyaline to sclerotic matrix was noted in 5 tumors. No papillary structures, atypical mitoses, or tumor necrosis were present. Immunohistochemically, all tumors expressed AE1/3, CK5/6, p40, and p63 strongly and diffusely. Luminal differentiation was highlighted by epithelial membrane antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen staining. S100 and SMA staining was absent. Follow-up (1 to 288 mo; median: 61 mo), available for 20 patients, showed no local recurrences and no disease-related mortality. Acral hidradenomas and digital papillary adenocarcinomas share a well-circumscribed dermal growth pattern containing solid, cystic, and tubular areas with mitotic activity and at least focal cytologic atypia. Lack of papillary structures and the diffuse positivity for p40 and p63 in the absence of S100 and SMA expression are helpful features in favor of acral hidradenoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".