MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998413830

Technical feasibility and economical viability of remote hybrid power systems in Northern Ontario

2011· article· en· W2998413830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Remote sensingComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As of 1996 there were 302 remote communities with a total population of 205,041 in
\nCanada. These communities are not connected to the Bulk Electric System (BES)
\nand as such are responsible for maintaining their own power systems to meet their
\nenergy requirements. As of 2010, 43 of the 302 remote communities were located
\nin the province of Ontario. These remote communities are primarily powered with
\ndiesel generators which are a proven technology that are not limited by external environmental
\nconstraints. However this begets a dependency upon hydrocarbon based
\nfuels which are: costly to purchase and transport, subject to volatility in the market,
\nand diminishing in supply. These trends indicate that fuel prices will continue to
\nescalate. Due to the relative isolation and cost of expanding the BES it is assumed
\nthat these communities will continue to operate as remote power systems for the foreseeable
\nfuture. As such, this thesis focuses on increasing self-sufficiency within these
\ncommunities to positively impact community welfare and the Canadian presence in
\nthe North. This is achieved through a technical feasibility and economical viability
\nanalysis of the application of remote hybrid power systems in Northern Ontario.
\nTo facilitate this research a model of a typical remote power system, located within
\nNorthern Ontario, is developed. This model may be employed for multitudinous tasks
\nincluding the technical feasibility and economical viability analysis of this thesis.
\nUsing this model a base case representing the existing diesel based generation is
\nperformed. The technologies investigated for hybrid system implementation include:
\nmethods of energy storage, solar energy conversion systems, wind energy conversion
\nsystems, and fuel cells. The proposed hybrid power systems are compared to the
\nbase case to determine their relative viability. The investigated technologies are also
\nanalyzed to determine their technical feasibility in the North. This investigation was
\ncompleted to aid with: the reduction of fossil fuel dependencies and of the net cost
\nof power generation, the creation of localized employment opportunities, and the
\npromotion of better planning and infrastructure development to increase community
\nself sufficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it