Technical feasibility and economical viability of remote hybrid power systems in Northern Ontario
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As of 1996 there were 302 remote communities with a total population of 205,041 in \nCanada. These communities are not connected to the Bulk Electric System (BES) \nand as such are responsible for maintaining their own power systems to meet their \nenergy requirements. As of 2010, 43 of the 302 remote communities were located \nin the province of Ontario. These remote communities are primarily powered with \ndiesel generators which are a proven technology that are not limited by external environmental \nconstraints. However this begets a dependency upon hydrocarbon based \nfuels which are: costly to purchase and transport, subject to volatility in the market, \nand diminishing in supply. These trends indicate that fuel prices will continue to \nescalate. Due to the relative isolation and cost of expanding the BES it is assumed \nthat these communities will continue to operate as remote power systems for the foreseeable \nfuture. As such, this thesis focuses on increasing self-sufficiency within these \ncommunities to positively impact community welfare and the Canadian presence in \nthe North. This is achieved through a technical feasibility and economical viability \nanalysis of the application of remote hybrid power systems in Northern Ontario. \nTo facilitate this research a model of a typical remote power system, located within \nNorthern Ontario, is developed. This model may be employed for multitudinous tasks \nincluding the technical feasibility and economical viability analysis of this thesis. \nUsing this model a base case representing the existing diesel based generation is \nperformed. The technologies investigated for hybrid system implementation include: \nmethods of energy storage, solar energy conversion systems, wind energy conversion \nsystems, and fuel cells. The proposed hybrid power systems are compared to the \nbase case to determine their relative viability. The investigated technologies are also \nanalyzed to determine their technical feasibility in the North. This investigation was \ncompleted to aid with: the reduction of fossil fuel dependencies and of the net cost \nof power generation, the creation of localized employment opportunities, and the \npromotion of better planning and infrastructure development to increase community \nself sufficiency.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle