MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998510732 · doi:10.18280/ts.360605

Gender Classification in Human Face Images for Smart Phone Applications Based on Local Texture Information and Evaluated Kullback-Leibler Divergence

2019· article· en· W2998510732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKullback–Leibler divergenceDivergence (linguistics)Smart phoneFace (sociological concept)Texture (cosmology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)SociologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main steps in human identification is gender classification which can increase the identification accuracy. In many smart phone applications, human identification plays an important role in different reasons such as login permission, sign up certificates, etc. So, accurate gender classification algorithms may increase the accuracy of smart phone applications and reduce its complexity. Also, one of the benefits of gender classification algorithms is for parents to monitor the social network contacts of their child in terms of gender. Different methods have been proposed to do it accurately so far. In all methods, classification accuracy is the main challenge for researchers. But, in smart phone applications, some challenges such as rotation, gray scale variations may reduce the accuracy. In this respect, a rotation invariant approach is proposed in this paper to classify genders in human face images based on improved version of local binary patters (ILBP). Local binary pattern (LBP) is a texture descriptor, which extract local contrast and spatial structure information. Some issues such as noise sensitivity, rotation sensitivity and low discriminative features can be considered as disadvantages of the basic LBP. ILBP solves the above disadvantages using a new theory for binary patterns categorization. The proposed approach includes two stages. First of all, a feature vector is extracted for human face images based on ILBP. Next, Kullback-Leibler divergence classifier is used to classify gender. In this paper Kullback Leibler classifier is evaluated based on log likelihood ratio as distance measure. In the result part, two databases, self-collected and ICPR are used as human face database. Results are compared by different well known methods in this literature that shows the high quality of the proposed approach in terms of accuracy rate. Other main advantages of our approach are rotation invariant, low noise sensitivity, size invariant and low computational complexity. The proposed approach decreases the computational complexity of smartphone applications because of reducing the number of database comparisons. It can also improve performance of the synchronous applications in the smartphones because of memory and CPU usage reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it