MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998545803 · doi:10.2514/6.2020-0985

Apparent Entropy Production Difference for Numerical Error Characterization

2020· article· en· W2998545803 on OpenAlexaff
Peter U. Ogban, G.F. Naterer

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntropy productionDiscretizationControl volumeMathematicsEntropy (arrow of time)Applied mathematicsFinite volume methodConservation lawMaximum entropy probability distributionComputationHeat transferMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisStatistical physicsThermodynamicsPhysicsPrinciple of maximum entropyAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An entropy-based error indicator is presented to evaluate the solution accuracy in fluid flow problems with heat transfer using the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This article presents a new approach for the characterization of numerical error using a newly developed parameter called an “apparent entropy production difference”. A control-volume-based finite-element method (CVFEM) is used to discretize the governing conservation equations and the Second Law. The procedure involves the computation and comparison of local entropy production rates obtained from two forms of the discretized entropy production equations – transport and positive-definite forms of the entropy generation equation. The computed local entropy generation for two problems involving heat transfer in fluid flow agrees well with benchmark solutions. The results of the numerical studies indicated that there is a correlation between the solution error in the computed scalar variable value in each control volume and the apparent entropy production difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Scitech 2020 ForumSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207