Differential Induction of SOCS Isoforms by <i>Leishmania donovani</i> Impairs Macrophage–T Cell Cross-Talk and Host Defense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Immune evasion strategies adopted by Leishmania donovani involve the exploitation of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins that are well-known negative regulators of the JAK/STAT pathway. However, the cellular mechanism underpinning the induction of SOCS isoforms and their role in breaching the multilevel regulatory circuit connecting the innate and adaptive arms of immunity are still ambiguous during experimental visceral leishmaniasis. Using bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMMфs) and CD4+ T cells, we observed that L. donovani preferentially upregulates SOCS1 and SOCS3 expression in macrophages and T cells, respectively, whereas the SOCS1 level remains consistently high in BMMфs and SOCS3 expression is pronounced and long lasting in T cells. Consequently, this inhibits STAT1-mediated IL-12 induction in macrophages & STAT4-mediated IFN-γ synthesis in T cells. Mechanistically, PI3K/Akt–mediated SRF activation promotes nuclear translocation and binding of Egr2 to SOCS1 promoter for its early induction in infected BMMфs. Additionally, L. donovani activates IDO/kynurenine/AHR signaling in BMMфs to maintain prolonged SOCS1 expression. Later, PGE2, secreted from infected BMMфs induces cAMP–PKA pathway by binding to the EP2/EP4 receptor of CD4+ T cells, leading to SP1, CREB, and GATA1 activation and SOCS3 expression. Small interfering RNA–mediated silencing of SOCS1 and SOCS3 in macrophage and T cells, respectively, restored IL-12 and IFN-γ cytokine levels and BMMф–T cell interaction. Vivo morpholino–mediated silencing of SOCS1 and SOCS3 resulted in protective cytokine responses, thereby reducing organ parasite burden significantly in L. donovani–infected BALB/c mice. Collectively, our results imply that L. donovani orchestrates different SOCS isoforms to impair macrophage–T cell cross-talk and preserve its own niche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".