MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998630356 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.159

91 The production of sulfated 16-androstene steroids by porcine Leydig cells and their potential role in the development of boar taint

2019· article· en· W2998630356 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Bone, Heidi Laderoute, Dyanne Brewer, Jocelyn Cameron, E. James Squires

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Quality and Safety Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrostenoneBoar taintSkatoleSulfationMetaboliteBOARChemistrySulfotransferaseChromatographyEndocrinologyInternal medicineMetabolismFood scienceBiochemistryBiologyAnimal scienceMedicineSemenAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Boar taint is a meat quality issue characterized by an off-odour or off-flavour in pork caused primarily by the accumulation of androstenone in the fat, but sensory estimates of boar taint do not always correlate with fat androstenone concentrations. However, these evaluations examine the sensory qualities of both the fat and lean tissue of heated pork products. Sulfated metabolites of androstenone are polar compounds that are abundantly produced by the Leydig cells of the testes, which may accumulate in more hydrophilic lean tissue. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the testicular metabolism of androstenone, which is responsible for the high production of sulfated androstenone metabolites. Leydig cells were isolated from 7-month-old Yorkshire, Duroc and terminal cross [Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire)] (n = 3) boars and incubated with radiolabeled androstenone for 8 hours. The proportion of sulfated metabolites produced was quantified using reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and radioisotope detection. The sulfated metabolites were subsequently identified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way ANOVA in SAS. Following isolation and analysis with LC-MS/MS, the sulfated metabolites were identified as androstenol-3-sulfate and two major sulfated forms of androstenone. Additionally, removal of the sulfate group from these two sulfated forms of androstenone returned the parent compound androstenone, and not a hydroxylated metabolite. The average production of sulfated androstenol produced across all boars was 52.1±8.6%, which was not significantly different (P = 0.7) from the average production of sulfated androstenone (47.9±8.6%). The results of this study indicate that androstenone is directly sulfated, which allows these sulfated metabolites to function as steroid reservoirs that can enzymatically regenerate free androstenone within hydrophilic lean tissue. Alternatively, these metabolites may accumulate in the lean tissue, which we are proposing as a novel mechanism that contributes to the development of boar taint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicFood Quality and Safety StudiesFrench-language works237,207