MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The organizational aspects of health care of students of institutions of higher professional education

2019· article· en· W2998678521 on OpenAlex
А. В. Казанцева, Elena V. Anufrieva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProblems of Social Hygiene Public Health and History of Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)AuditHealth carePopulationPsychologyMedical careRussian federationFamily medicineQuality (philosophy)Medical educationMedicineEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceSociologyBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades, both in the Russian Federation and in the Sverdlovsk oblast decreasing of population size of adolescents and deterioration of their physical development and health status were established. In Russia, the organization of medical care of college students is insufficiently organized and requires additional improvements. The selective assessment of activities of medical offices in six colleges in Yekaterinburg was implemented. The sociological surveys were organized on the basis of the international HBSC questionnaire to study opinions of the minors about organization of medical care in colleges (653 students interviewed) and prevalence of health risk factors among students (1142 students were interviewed). In the Sverdlovsk region in 2018, only 53.6% of colleges were licensed for carrying out medical activities. According to the study, medical care in colleges was provided by medical assistant of medical office. This condition resulted in that not all the students underwent preventive examinations or underwent them not in required fullness. The medical personnel of colleges provided no analysis of health status of adolescents and health education is insufficient. The analysis of the data of sociological surveys established high prevalence of behavioral risk factors among underage students. Almost half of respondents noted the presence of harmful habits and only quarter of respondents paid attention to healthy diet. The percentage of respondents claimed that they tasted and consumed "spices" and "surfactants" was high against the background of low awareness of dangers of these habits. To amend this situation, it is necessary to organize auditing of quality of medical care of students in colleges, to analyze quality of preventive examinations, to develop a set of preventive measures of promoting health of students of colleges, based on their motivation and psychological characteristics, involving students themselves in the process, applying interactive forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it