MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998723686 · doi:10.51656/psycause.v9i2.20148

Lien entre le stress parental et la sensibilité maternelle entre six et 18 mois

2019· article· fr· W2998723686 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Catherine Poveda Perdomo, Claudia Bergeron, Mathilde Yergeau, Laura-Émilie Savage, Audrey Gauthier-Légaré, Jean‐Pascal Lemelin, Marc A. Provost, George M. Tarabulsy

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université Laval · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité LavalUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Jeunesse de Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De nombreuses études ont démontré que le stress parental (SP) affecte la qualité des interactions mère-enfant. En effet, de nombreux auteurs proposent que le stress et la détresse que peuvent expérimenter les parents dans leur rôle parental puissent avoir une influence importante sur la sensibilité maternelle (SM) (Cmic & Low, 2002; Deater-Deckard, 1998; Neuhauser, 2018). Cependant, il est possible que les effets entre le SP et la SM lors d’interactions puissent être bidirectionnels (Booth & al., 2018). Ainsi, des niveaux élevés d’insensibilité donneraient lieu à des difficultés comportementales et émotionnelles chez l’enfant, pouvant être à la base d’expériences de SP. Cette étude examine les liens entre le SP et la SM lors d’interactions mère-enfant lorsque l’enfant est âgé de 6, 10, 15 et 18 mois. L’échantillon comprend 160 dyades mère-enfants. La SM est évaluée avec une mesure observationnelle (MBQS) et le SP avec un questionnaire autorapporté (PSI). Les résultats montrent un seul lien bidirectionnel, soit entre le SP à 10 mois et la SM à 18 mois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université LavalSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207