¡Que se vayan todos, que no quede uno solo! La crisis institucional en Chile: factores contributivos del socavamiento de las bases culturales de la democracia (1990-2018)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo analiza algunos factores institucionales y estructurales que han contribuido progresivamente a un divorcio entre ciudadanía y representantes en el caso chileno. Este distanciamiento entre política y sociedad ha sido denominado por diversos autores como “crisis institucional”. Se sostiene que existe una amalgama de elementos que han contribuido decididamente a este socavamiento de las bases culturales de la democracia, entre los que se encuentran, el diseño institucional de democracia protegida con sus enclaves autoritarios, los repetidos casos de corrupción que han minado la confianza ciudadana, además de una crónica mala distribución de la riqueza. Estos elementos han sido muy relevantes en la producción de una creciente desafección política que ha devenido en fuertes movilizaciones sociales, las que han puesto en cuestionamiento la legitimidad de las instituciones democráticas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".