MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Entrevista: Stevan Harnad

2008· article· pt· W2998763872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lígia Maria Arruda Café, Hélio Kuramoto

Bibliographic record

VenueEncontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professor Stevan Harnad*, filho de Hernád István e Hesslein István, húngaro, nasceu em Budapest, nasceu cientista na área cognitiva. Ele fez seus trabalhos de prégraduação na Universidade McGill e graduou-se pela Universidade de Princeton University. Atualmente, ele ocupa a cátedra de pesquisa em Ciência Cognitiva na Universidade de Quebec, em Montreal – Canadá (UQAM) e é professor de Ciências Cognitivas na Universidade de Southampton. Participa, como membro externo, da Academia de Ciência Húngara. Sua pesquisa está concentrada nas áreas de categorização, comunicação e cognição.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da InformaçãoSame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207