MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998787624 · doi:10.1038/s41391-020-0204-8

“TREXIT 2020”: why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now

2020· review· en· W2998787624 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy Grummet, Michael A. Gorin, Rick Popert, Tim O’Brien, Alastair Lamb, Boris Hadaschik, Jan Philipp Radtke, Florian Wagenlehner, Eduard Baco, Caroline M. Moore, Mark Emberton, Arvin K. George, John W. Davis, Richard J. Szabo, Roger Buckley, Andrew Loblaw, Matthew Allaway, Christof Kastner, Erik Briers, Peter Royce, Mark Frydenberg, Declan G. Murphy, Henry H. Woo

Bibliographic record

VenueProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreNorth York General Hospital
FundersAcademy of Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UK
KeywordsMedicineUrologyProstateProstate biopsyGeneral surgeryBiopsyProstatic DiseasesRadiologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1847, 20 years before germ theory was popularised by Louis Pasteur, the Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis famously reduced maternal mortality from post-partum sepsis from 16 to 1% simply by encouraging hand hygiene among his peers [ 1 ]. Despite the evidence, many physicians of the day were offended by the assertion that they themselves may be the cause of patient deaths and rejected Semmelweis’s life-saving advice. Aged just 47, he suffered a nervous breakdown, was committed to an asylum and died within 2 weeks, ironically and tragically, from a gangrenous wound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProstate Cancer and Prostatic DiseasesSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207