Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the new Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Group document for design of marine structures associated with liquified natural gas (LNG) facilities, Design Requirements for Marine Structures Associated with LNG Facilities (DRMS) (EXP 276.1-2015). The CSA Group has a well-known reference for LNG facilities in Canada entitled CSA Z276 Liquified Natural Gas—Production, Storage, and Handling. However, the document provides minimal guidance for LNG marine terminals. An effort was started by the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission (BCOGC) to fill in the gaps and develop standards for the marine structures associated with LNG facilities. The document is a result of team effort by several Canadian and U.S. engineers representing various governmental agencies and consulting firms. The document addresses the structural, mooring, and berthing requirements of fixed marine structures. In addition, this new document includes specific structural requirements, with reference to Canadian, European, and American codes, metocean and seismic criteria, pipelines, geotechnical recommendations, and the tsunami potential. The document is currently used by BCOGC in British Columbia and has wide applicability outside of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".