MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998902485 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2019.2960489

Magnetic Barkhausen Noise Measurements to Assess Temper Embrittlement in HY-80 Steels

2020· article· en· W2998902485 on OpenAlexafffund
Aroba Saleem, P. R. Underhill, Shannon P. Farrell, Thomas W. Krause

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBarkhausen effectMaterials scienceEmbrittlementMagnetizationMagnetic domainCondensed matter physicsMagnetostrictionDomain wall (magnetism)Grain boundaryRelaxation (psychology)ImpurityFerromagnetismMetallurgyMicrostructureMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic Barkhausen noise (MBN) can result from abrupt motion of domain walls due to their interaction with pinning sites during magnetization of ferromagnetic steel. However, understanding domain structure interactions with pinning site density is limited. In this article, the effect of density of pinning sites within grains of HY80 steel, on generation of MBN, was investigated. Pinning site density was modified by a heat treatment that produces temper embrittlement. Temper embrittlement refers to the reduction of fracture toughness of alloy steels when heated or slowly cooled through the embrittling temperature range and arises due to migration of impurity elements to grain boundaries. Samples, machined from a casting, were held at a constant temperature (525 °C) for different holding times, to generate varying degrees of temper embrittlement. MBN signal response was observed to decrease exponentially as a function of holding time with decay constants (relaxation time) in the range of 160-190 h. A reduction in the MBN signal along each sample's easy axis was attributed to different densities of impurity elements, which act as pinning sites for domain wall movement within grains. Samples were also characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), hardness testing, and impact toughness testing. Hardness was observed to increase with holding time and MBN energy decreased linearly with increasing hardness. Furthermore, a linear relationship between impact energy and MBN energy was observed. This implies that MBN signal analysis can be used as an indirect measure of the change in material properties of the sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207